Is Our Drinking Water At Risk?
http://larchmont.patch.com/articles/is-our-drinking-water-at-risk
Is Our Drinking Water At Risk?
League of Women Voters sponsors breakfast to discuss what’s happening in the Marcellus Shale.
By Keith Loria | Email the author | February 6, 2010
The natural gas industry considers the Marcellus Shale something of a gold mine, as the ancient rock formation, extending through Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York, contains between 168 trillion to 516 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, experts say.
The problem is that to extract the gas, companies are using new technologies combining large quantities of water, pressure and unidentified chemicals to force the gas from the shale, and many believe that this endangers our drinking water, forests, wildlife and personal well-being.
More than two dozen concerned citizens and local government officials were on hand at Hector’s Village Café yesterday morning to hear about these dangers in an event presented by the League of Women Voters (LWV) of Larchmont and Mamaroneck.
“We are always interested in educating people on how to take positive steps,” said Elisabeth Radow, the chair of the Environmental Committee for the LWV branch.
“It’s a very compelling topic and is one of the most critical topics that I have seen in a long time,” she said. “We are looking overall at 15 million people whose water supply can be affected because of the drilling.”
One thing was made very clear by the discussion: New York doesn’t have the right kind of regulations in place to handle the environmental realities and the consequences can be serious.
Marian Rose of the Croton Watershed Clean Water Coalition began by talking about how the drilling unleashes natural radioactivity in very large doses, so there’s the potential of toxicity or cancer.
“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has no control over what they are doing, and they will not tell you what the impact will be,” Rose said. “We believe if you don’t know what’s going to happen, then don’t do it.”
Currently, New York has no regulations about the amount of water that can be extracted. A large concern is that the more drilling that is done, the more water that is needed, and therefore, the forests are being put in danger.
“The Coalition is trying hard to protect the forests in this area,” Rose said. “Nearly 75 percent of our watershed is from the forest, which is why we have good water. If you fragment the forest too much, the landscape will be transformed to a bleak industrial landscape, which will have a major impact on water quality.”
Deborah Goldberg, managing attorney of Earthjustice’s New York office, startled the crowd when she talked about water in Pennsylvania that was apparently affected by the drilling so much that water from faucets could be lit on fire.
“The state of Pennsylvania realized quickly that if they continued to drill they would impact every fresh water stream in a period of two years,” she said. “They are now preparing regulations to protect their waters.”
The hope is that New York will do the same thing. As it stands now, New York is in the middle of an environmental review process, and environmental groups hope that the regulations will be substantially revised. If not, Goldberg said, expect to see a great deal of litigation come about.
Ernie Odierna, councilman for the Town of Mamaroneck, was on-hand and believes this is an issue that everyone should get behind.
“Residents should communicate with their elected officials,” he said. “We are fortunate to have Assemblyman George Latimer here today to hear it first hand, but the rest of them should know about the jeopardy that our environment is being put into because of this. I think that’s key.”
The following is my opinion:
1. The drilling standards and guideance must put in place a construction that protects waters with a total dissolved solids of < 10,000 mg/L.
2. Natural gas well construction must use wells that are completely cased and cemented and not an open borehole approach.
3. The standard well should have multiple cemented casings to properly seal off the shallow freshwater aquifer, confined freshwater aquifer, and completely separate the fresh and saline aquifers. This needs to be based on data and not a quess.
4.SInce there is probably not enough regulators to oversee construction, it should be a requirement that third party inspectors licensed in Pennsylvania certify the well construction. This way the person or company license and liability is on the line.
5. Permitting should include real restoration plans, emergency response planning, and the baseline water quality data must be available to the community.
6. Regarding fracing – lined ponds should not hold any flow back water and this should all be returned to a tank and the develop should recycle as much as possible and use a gradle to grave tracking approach.
7. Chemicals – the chemicals are disclosed in the permit – but the MSDS Sheets and copy of permit application should be on-file at the local level.
8. Roads should be properly bonded.
9. State should consider increasing permit fees and plugging fees to cover the real cost of plugging these deep wells.
10 Personally – I am very concerned about the initial leases that provide very little control by the landowner, potential for deep well injection of brines and hauling of contaminated fluids and materials.
Just my personal thoughts
My Blog is
http://pennsylvania-solutions.blogspot.com/
Many of the points are better described.
Also The EPA TIp Line
Natural Gas Drilling Tip Line
EPA's Mid-Atlantic Region has a natural gas drilling tip line for reporting dumping and other illegal or suspicious hauling and/or disposal activities.
Tip line number (toll free): 1-877-919-4372 (877-919-4EPA)
URL: http://www.epa.gov/region03/marcellus_shale/tipline.html
Tip email address: eyesondrilling@epa.gov
Tip mailing address:
EPA Region 3
1650 Arch Street (3CEOO)
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029