A debate over fly ash disposal

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10350/1109210-114.stm

A debate over fly ash disposal

Thursday, December 16, 2010
By David Templeton and Don Hopey, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Piles of fly ash sit atop a hill at the Matt Canestrale Contracting Inc. disposal site in La Belle, Fayette County.

Before Penn Power created Little Blue Lake in 1975, the company circulated fliers advertising a picturesque recreation area where people could boat and ski on blue waters.

So 35 years later, where are all the boats and skiers?

And, for that matter, where’s the lake?

The so-called “lake” in Beaver County’s Greene Township, near the boroughs of Georgetown and Hookstown, was created as a disposal pit for calcium sulfate and fly ash generated at the 2,390-megawatt Bruce Mansfield Power Plant in nearby Shippingport.

Today it looks like moonscape.

Coal waste, 400 feet deep and even deeper, extends across the state line into West Virginia’s Northern Panhandle and covers about 1,000 acres on a site that is 2 square miles. The 100 million tons of waste includes 60 million tons of calcium sulfate — generated by the scrubbing process to remove sulfur dioxide from smokestack emissions — and 40 million tons of fly ash, which is a byproduct of the coal-burning process to produce electricity.

The only sign of life on a late-summer day was a flock of Canada geese walking — not swimming — across the weird surface.

As one of the nation’s largest coal-waste disposal sites, Little Blue is a centerpiece of a nationwide debate about the safety of such impoundments and whether fly ash should be designated as hazardous waste.

Heavy metals in fly ash, including arsenic, lead, mercury, cobalt and thallium, should be designated as hazardous, environmental groups say.

But the power industry says such a designation will hinder beneficial uses for fly ash, including in concrete. Calcium sulfate is used in wallboard, but its dust can irritate eyes, skin, mucous membranes and the upper respiratory tract. Dust periodically has been a concern at the site.

Critics question whether the millions of tons can remain sealed on site or if their heavy metals leach into groundwater and damage the environment and public health.

The more immediate debate centers on whether leaching already has begun.

Site owner FirstEnergy Corp., based in Akron, Ohio, says its “first of its kind” disposal site is safe. Up to 3.2 million gallons of sludge are sent daily to the site through seven miles of overland pipes.

“It’s been operating for 34 or 35 years safely with all the structural integrity it is designed to have,” said Ellen Raines, spokeswoman for FirstEnergy, which always has owned Little Blue but previously under the name Penn Power.

The state Department of Environmental Protection supports that conclusion.

“Coal-ash facilities in the region have to manage the waste, so they figure out how much waste they have and how long they can use the site and how to plan for continued disposal,” said Diane McDaniel, DEP facilities chief for waste management. “It’s nothing unusual.”

But the Environmental Integrity Project, working on behalf of concerned Greene Township residents, says Little Blue already is posing risks to the environment and residents’ health.

Lisa Graves Marcucci, an Integrity Project official who’s been studying Little Blue for years, points to problems she says the company and DEP have refused to remedy them.

“[FirstEnergy has] 10 of 69 monitoring wells on site showing elevated spikes for arsenic — and that’s as recent as the first and second quarters of this year,” she said. “The monitoring wells are the sentinels that say there’s a problem at the site, and if not addressed, will leave the site.”

A report issued by the Integrity Project, the Sierra Club and Earthjustice in September says 39 coal-ash dump sites in 21 states, including Little Blue, “are contaminating drinking water or surface water with arsenic and other heavy metals.”

The report also says state governments aren’t adequately monitoring the sites and encourages the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to enact new regulations designating fly ash as a hazardous waste to protect the public.

Every coal-ash site equipped with groundwater monitoring wells, it says, has concentrations of heavy metals — arsenic and lead included — that exceed federal drinking-water standards.

But Jeff Smith, a DEP geologist and expert on Little Blue Run and the disposal site, said quarterly data from monitoring wells at and surrounding the impoundment reveal no excess levels of primary contaminants. “That has been proven with the data and in all the residential samples I’ve collected,” he said.

Sporadic elevations in arsenic levels in 2009 and 2010 were traced to fertilizer FirstEnergy was using to plant grass over areas of the impoundment. Arsenic levels declined once the company changed fertilizers, Mr. Smith said.

In the 1970s, Penn Power built its earthen dam across Little Blue Run near the point where it enters the Ohio River, just north of Chester, W.Va., and across the river from East Liverpool, Ohio.

Initially, the company thought coal waste would sink to the lake bottom and harden into low-grade concrete, leaving the surface pristine and available for recreation. But it soon became apparent that the lake never could be open to the public, Ms. Raines said.

The entire disposal site now is encircled by a chain-link fence.

Unregulated waste
The American Coal Ash Association, which promotes beneficial uses for coal-combustion products, said the United States in 2007 produced 131 million tons of such materials, of which 75 million tons not used in concrete and other products had to be disposed of in 1,300 fly-ash dumps nationwide.

Most are not monitored or regulated.

Recent collapses of waste-impoundments display potential for health and environmental consequences when such systems fail.

The wall of a large impoundment of red sludge at the Hungarian Aluminum Production and Trade Co. collapsed Oct. 4 and sent the sludge flowing through a Hungarian town. Nine people died.

Fly-ash disposal became a domestic concern on Dec. 22, 2008, when a disposal cell at the TVA Kingston Fossil Plant in Tennessee collapsed and released 5.4 million cubic yards of ash slurry (ash mixed with water) onto 300 acres, polluting nearby Emory and Clinch rivers in the process.

A neighborhood had to be evacuated due to heavy-metal contamination and three homes were destroyed by the wave of water and ash.

Although soil samples contained arsenic, cobalt, iron and thallium levels that exceeded “residential Superfund soil-screening values,” the EPA ultimately ruled that the waste was not hazardous.

But the collapses have spawned fresh concern about Little Blue.

The dam, standing 400 feet high, looms over the Ohio River and represents that largest earthen dam in the eastern United States. In 2009 the EPA designated that the dam has “High Hazard Potential,” which means failure would lead to loss of life.

Ms. Raines of FirstEnergy said the dam’s height alone was reason for EPA’s hazard rating. She said the dam is safe: “It is inspected by our contractors twice a year and by DEP once a year.”

The dam, built with 9 million cubic yards of rock, has a base 1,300-feet thick and a top that’s 2,200 feet across, or about two-fifths of a mile. No one lives in the area between the dam and the Ohio River, Ms. Raines said.

Monitors are built into the dam to detect any movement. “This is not something taken lightly,” she said. “Safety has been the emphasis from the beginning.”

But Ms. Graves Marcucci said water seeps through the dam from the impoundment. But seepage is an expected consequence of the dam’s design, FirstEnergy said, noting that it collects the water and pumps it back into the impoundment.

Because the lake is full, the company has been filling sausage-shaped “geotubes” with dry waste since 2006 and stacking them atop the lake. FirstEnergy anticipates using Little Blue for five to eight more years. In time, it will be covered with mulch to promote vegetation growth. Only time will tell if the 1,300-acre impoundment can ever be used for anything other than a disposal pit.

“Keep in mind that this is a cement-like substance that hardens to a low-grade concrete” due to the presence of calcium sulfate, Ms. Raines said. “It dries up and sets. The situation in Tennessee was wet fly ash. That’s not the situation in Little Blue.”

DEP’s Mr. Smith said Little Blue’s white semi-solid surface is like putty; it’s not low-grade concrete but more substantial than a gel. The putty-like substance would help prevent heavy metals from leaching, he said.

Ms. Raines said FirstEnergy has tested well water on residential properties 70 times without discovering problems that can be traced to the impoundment.

But Ms. Graves Marcucci said the 100 million tons of sludge is pressing down on aquifers, creating pressure that potentially could cause heavy metals to leach into groundwater. Greene Township residents have no access to public water and rely on wells.

A University of Pittsburgh study, led by Conrad Dan Volz from Pitt’s Graduate School of Public Health, is studying water quality in Greene Township but results are not yet available.

Neighbors’ concerns
West Virginians living near the impoundment face their own set of problems. Water has begun seeping from hillsides surrounding the impoundment, raising fears that water from Little Blue could be moving off site.

One woman’s sloping lawn is rolling up like carpeting due to hillside seepage.

Two other people have thyroid and respiratory illnesses they link to exposure to the impoundment over the hill from their home. They say a FirstEnergy official advised them against eating vegetables from their backyard garden, but company officials said no such advisory was ever issued.

At the home of John Reed Jr. within 1,000 yards of Little Blue, FirstEnergy’s water-well testing showed arsenic levels above safe drinking water limits. The company and DEP confirmed the high levels in one reading, but attributed it to a bad well casing that allowed the natural arsenic from soil to infiltrate the well.

DEP officials said seeps from the hillsides around the impoundment are under investigation.

Mark Durbin, a FirstEnergy spokesman, said the seep issue is “something we’re aware of and have discussed with residents. “We are hoping to move soon to take care of it,” he said.

Another concern is FirstEnergy’s proposal to build a new dry-waste disposal site with a double clay liner in Greene Township. FirstEnergy already owns 23 percent of the township, and supervisors said they don’t want another waste dump.

Health link?
Ultimately, the issue focuses on whether health impacts can be linked to Little Blue. Residents have done informal health surveys that have scared them.

“We seem to have a high rate of cancer,” said Sandra Wright, Greene Township secretary-treasurer. “On any road you have two or three people living with cancer daily.”

The township wants air monitors to determine the extent of air pollution from local and downwind sources. It also is awaiting results from the Pitt study before deciding on a next step.

The Post-Gazette’s ecological study of mortality rates for heart and respiratory disease and lung cancer shows elevated rates for the combined area of Greene Township, Hookstown and Georgetown.

Heart disease deaths there were 46 percent higher than the national rate. The total of 88 deaths from all three diseases is 42 percent higher than the predicted number of 62 deaths, based on national rates.

Scientific studies say these diseases can be linked to air pollution, but there are no studies suggesting a direct link to heavy-metal or fly-ash exposure.

David Templeton: dtempleton@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1578. Don Hopey: dhopey@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1983.

First published on December 16, 2010 at 12:00 am

Residents of Dimock Township receive $4.1 million

Dimock, Pennsylvania Residents to Share $4.1 Million, Receive Gas Mitigation Systems Under DEP-Negotiated Settlement with Cabot Oil and Gas

Additional $500,000 to Reimburse DEP for Investigative Costs; DEP to Drop Montrose Water Line Plan Given Uncertain Prospects

HARRISBURG, Pa., Dec. 15, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ —  Residents of Dimock Township, Susquehanna County, who have had their drinking water supplies contaminated by natural gas will each receive a share of $4.1 million that Cabot Oil and Gas Co. will pay under a settlement negotiated by the Department of Environmental Protection and the company.

The settlement, which will enable the affected families to address their individual circumstances as they see fit, also binds Cabot to offer and pay to install whole-house gas mitigation devices in each of the 19 affected homes.

Cabot also will pay DEP $500,000 to offset the state’s expense of investigating the stray gas migration cases that have plagued Dimock residents for nearly two years.

“The 19 families in Dimock who have been living under very difficult conditions for far too long will receive a financial settlement that will allow them to address their own circumstances in their own way,” said DEP Secretary John Hanger, who explained that the amount paid to each family will equal two-times the value of their home, with a minimum payment of $50,000.

“In addition to the significant monetary component of this settlement, there is a requirement that Cabot continue to work with us to ensure that none of their wells allow gas to migrate,” Hanger noted.

DEP began investigating reports of stray gas in Dimock water wells in January 2009. A consent order and agreement signed in November 2009 required Cabot to install whole-house treatment systems in 14 homes, but residents found that action to be unsatisfactory.

The agreement was modified in April 2010 and DEP ordered Cabot to cap three wells believed to be the source of the migrating gas. DEP also suspended its review of Cabot’s pending permit applications for new drilling activities statewide and prohibited the company from drilling any new wells in a nine-square-mile area around Dimock.

In September, DEP announced that Pennsylvania American Water Co. would construct a 5.5-mile water main from its Lake Montrose water treatment plant to supply the affected Dimock residents with a reliable source of quality drinking water. In November, the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority, or PENNVEST, approved an $11.8 million grant and loan package for the project, with the commonwealth intending to recover the cost of the project from Cabot.

Given the opposition to the planned water line and the uncertain future the project faces, Hanger said the department would abandon its pursuit of the project.

“Our primary goal at the department has always been to ensure that the wells Cabot drilled in Dimock were safe and that they were not contaminating local private water supplies,” said Hanger. “We’ve made great progress in doing that. Since we initiated our enforcement actions, gas levels in a majority of the contaminated water wells have gone down significantly. This agreement lays the foundation for families to finally put an end to this ordeal.”

Media contact: Michael Smith, 717-787-1323

SOURCE Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dimock-pennsylvania-residents-to-share-41-million-receive-gas-mitigation-systems-under-dep-negotiated-settlement-with-cabot-oil-and-gas-111961099.html

Sensors to Assess Water Quality

http://www.azosensors.com/Details.asp?newsID=1726

Sensors to Assess Water Quality

In order to determine the condition of drinking water due to horizontal gas drilling, a pre-drilling water examination will be carried out for identifying the variation in water quality before and after the drilling process, with respect to the statements of the residents of Pennsylvania.

Various sensors will be employed for executing these tests. Ten of the sensors will be integrated along the branches of the Southern Tier Susquehanna River, for monitoring the quality of the water.

According to Kimberly Dille, of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, the sensors will be monitoring the conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH and the turbidity conditions of the water. He remarked that, the quality will be assessed every five minutes and upon the progression of horizontal gas drilling in New York, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission will be measuring the status of water irrespective of time, to avoid the contamination of water.

Andrew Gavin, of SRBC, commented that, when sensing any change in the normal water quality, a warning will be given to their office, providing rapid alertness to the officials about the condition. The SRBC has been collaborating with the Tioga County Planning Department for detecting areas to install these sensing devices on the Apalachin and Catatonk Creeks. According to Elaine Jardine, Director of Tioga, Planning and detecting the quality of water prior to the drilling process, while drilling and after the drilling process is highly significant for knowing the safety of the drinking water.

The SRBC will be integrating ten sensors in New York and has already installed thirty in Pennsylvania. After the establishment of a monitoring station, anyone can assess the status of water through SRBC.net.

Fracking expert to speak at LCCC

http://citizensvoice.com/news/drilling/fracking-expert-to-speak-at-lccc-1.1076898

Fracking expert to speak at LCCC

Published: December 14, 2010

The Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition is sponsoring a presentation by Cornell University professor Dr. A. R. Ingraffea, “Unconventional Gas Plays: Information for an Informed Citizenry,” at 7 p.m. Thursday in Room 132 of Luzerne County Community College’s Educational Conference Center.

Ingraffea, an expert on hydraulic fracturing, is the Dwight C. Baum professor of Engineering and Weiss Presidential fellow at Cornell University’s School of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

Ingraffea has won numerous awards, done research and development for organizations including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Gas Research Institute, the U.S. Department of Transportation and several private companies, and is on the candidate list for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Science Advisory Board for the Review of Hydraulic Fracturing Study.

For more information, call 570-266-5116, visit www.gdacoalition.org or e-mail gdacoaltion@gmail.com.

A primer on Marcellus Shale geology and technology offered in webinar

http://live.psu.edu/story/50263#nw69
Monday, December 6, 2010

A primer on Marcellus Shale geology and technology offered in webinar

University Park, Pa. — By now, many are aware of the huge volume of natural gas held in the deeply buried Marcellus Shale formation and its enormous economic potential for Pennsylvania and neighboring states.

For those who want to learn more about the Marcellus “play,” Penn State Cooperative Extension is offering a free, Web-based seminar at 1 p.m. on Dec. 16, titled, “Plumbing the Depths in Pa.: A Primer on Marcellus Shale Geology and Technology.”

During the one-hour webinar, Michael Arthur, professor of geosciences, will focus on the geology of the Marcellus Shale and technology for extraction as they influence exploration and development of the natural-gas resource. Co-director of the Penn State Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research, Arthur will answer questions from online participants during the session.

“The middle Devonian Marcellus Formation in the Appalachian Basin of Pennsylvania and New York is estimated to contain in excess of 486 trillion cubic feet of extractable natural gas,” he said. “That is sufficient for more than 20 years supply at the United States’ current rate of consumption.”

Arthur pointed out that there also is the possibility of additional significant shale gas deposits that may be targeted within the same basin — Devonian black shale units above the Marcellus Shale and the Ordovician Utica Shale below.

“In my presentation, I will discuss the geologic characteristics of the Marcellus Shale formation, the estimated volume of gas deposits at various points, and the process and effect of hydraulic fracturing,” Arthur said. “I also will address the continuing concern that drilling operations could allow gas migration into shallow, fresh-water aquifers, which is now being studied intensively.”

The webinar, “Plumbing the Depths in Pa.: A Primer on Marcellus Shale Geology and Technology,” is part of an ongoing series of workshops and events addressing issues related to the state’s Marcellus Shale gas boom. Information about how to register for the webinar is available on the webinar page of Penn State Cooperative Extension’s “Natural Gas” website. .

Additional one-hour webinars will be held at 1 p.m. on the following dates:

— Jan. 20, 2011: “Marcellus Shale Legislation: What Was Accomplished in the 2009-10 Session and What Issues Remain to be Addressed.”

— Feb. 16, 2011: “Dealing with Gas Tax Issues: What You Need to Know.”

— March 17, 2011: “Natural Gas Well Development and Emergency Response and Management.”

Previous webinars, publications and other information on topics such as water use and quality, zoning, gas-leasing considerations for landowners and implications for local communities also are available on the “Natural Gas” website at http://extension.psu.edu/naturalgas.

For more information, contact John Turack, extension educator in Westmoreland County, at 724-837-1402 or by e-mail at jdt15@psu.edu.

Fracking: New drilling method prompts concerns

http://tribune-democrat.com/local/x1531215899/Fracking-New-drilling-method-prompts-concerns
December 13, 2010

Fracking: New drilling method prompts concerns

By Kathy Mellott kmellott@tribdem.com

John Slesinger of Elton stands next to drums of water he keeps in his basement after he says his well was contaminated by a nearby drilling operation.

JOHNSTOWN — Mention Marcellus Shale natural gas drilling and the subject of “fracking” quickly follows.

Fracking – hydraulic fracturing – is the process used to crack open the deep, dense shale bed that lies more than a mile below earth’s surface.

Estimates are that the Marcellus abundance is so great that Pennsylvania likely will have as many as 100,000 wells in years to come, changing the landscape dramatically.

Knowledge of the gas in the shale bed is not new, but the technology to go after it is new.

Drilling companies are now capable of drilling straight down into the Marcellus Shale, and then outward at an angle into the slanted shale bed.

Fracking involves pumping large volumes of water and sand into a drilled area to break the shale fissures to push out the gas that lies between them.

Geologists, hydrobiologists and the gas industry say fracking has been around for 60 years, not only in the oil-rich Southwest, but in the Northeast.

Fracking has been used safely and efficiently across the U.S. for more than 60 years, and in Pennsylvania since shortly after World War II, according to the Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association, which wrote: “The goal of the fracking process is to create a pathway of man-made cracks in the rock that allow gas to flow from the shale into the well bore.”

Improved technology allowed for a greater water volume and changes in chemical additives used in the process. That opened the door for the deep shale gases to be reached more economically, said hydrogeologist David Yoxtheimer of Penn State’s Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research.

A bendable well casing is turned horizonally about 500 feet above the Marcellus bed.

The fracking is done through lateral drillings that are 2,000 to 7,000 feet long – opening up a natural gas drainage area.

One well pad with four or more wells can drain the natural gas from a square mile, said Michael Arthur, a geologist and MCOR co-director.

Research being done at Penn State may lead to the use of carbon dioxide and propane in the fracking process. But water continues to be the most common means, Yoxtheimer said.

‘Most previous resource’

The magnitude of the drilling/fracking process, the large volumes of water needed and the potential release of chemicals into nearby waterways concerns many people, including environmentalists.

A recent Tribune-Democrat Web poll of 2,034 readers showed that 1,226, or 60 percent, were concerned about the risks of fracking. A total of 478, or 24 precent, thought the process is safe, while 329, or 16 percent, indicated they have no knowledge of the fracking process.

Ralph Kimber, a Williams-port resident and a member of Responsible Drilling Alliance of Lycoming County, fears there is much that may be learned after the wells are already installed and operational.

“Water will be the most precious resource in the world by the end of this century,” Kimber said.

Others think the concerns are exaggerated.

The Ground Water Protection Council, a national group whose mission is to safeguard water sources, stated in a 2009 report that the potential for groundwater contamination due to hydraulic fracturing is remote.

A huge concern is the potential for human error and carelessness.

The state Department of Environmental Protection reported late last week that it had fined RN Industries Trucking Inc. $3,000 for allegedly storing drilling wastewater in five tanks at a site in Clearfield County.

An April inspection revealed that there were 1,950 barrels, or about 82,000 gallons, of the wastewater on the site in Sandy Township. No spillage or ground contamination was reported, said Dan Spadoni of DEP’s regional office in Williamsport.

A May follow-up inspection showed the site was no longer being used for storage and the wastewater had been removed.

The fine money was put into the state’s Solid Waste Abatement Fund to help pay for environmental cleanups statewide, Spadoni said.

‘Minimum of chemicals’

A concern echoed across the state is the large amount of water that fracking requires   – usually between 3 million and 5 million gallons per well, with some well pads hosting six to eight wells.

The water sources vary, but much of the fracking water in Pennsylvania comes from groundwater sources – including local streams and rivers – or is purchased from municipal water companies.

While an increasing number of drilling companies are building pipelines to move water to well sites, much water continues to be transported in tanker trucks.

Water makes up 95 percent of the fracking mix, with sand accounting for 4.5 percent. The rest is comprised of small amounts of various compounds  – hydrochloric acid, friction reducers and corrosive inhibitors, Yoxtheimer said.

The solution is mixed at the well site before high pressure injection.

An estimated 70 chemicals can be used in the fracturing process, but most drillers use very few, sometimes only three or four.

“On any given frack job, they’re using a minimum of chemicals,” Yoxtheimer said.

The fracking begins with a “charge” – a big bullet of lead or metal sent into the well. The force punctures through the shale. The water, sand and chemicals are then pumped in, Yoxtheimer said.

Engineers with Chief Gas and Oil call the puncturing device a “perf gun,” which is inserted into the drilled well. The gun uses an electrical current to set off small gunpowder-filled caps to create holes in the shale.

The sand holds the fractures open, allowing the natural gas to escape up the well. The chemicals are needed to allow the process to happen, Yoxtheimer said.

For example, he said, a surfactant reduces surface tension of the water; potassium chloride reduces friction; hydrochloric acid cleans out any cement and prevents clogging.

The industry is striving to reduce the number of chemicals, Yoxtheimer said.

Chief – which has a number of wells in the Cambria-Somerset region – has made progress, said Kristi Gittins, vice president of public affairs.

“We’ve been doing this for 12 years, and we use fewer chemicals now than we ever have,” Gittins said.

DEP’s new Marcellus well and drilling regulations require gas companies to disclose the chemicals used in a well.

‘A lot more stuff’

The fracking is done in an area of geology formed 400 million years ago, an area which once served as ocean floor and today has salt levels 10 times that of sea water, geologists say.

The bulk of the water used for fracking remains in the ground.

Currently, the most troubling part of the process for many is the estimated 10 percent to 15 percent of the frack water that comes back out of the pressurized well. Sometimes the amount can be as high as 20 percent. The back-flow contains some of the chemicals sent down the well, which then have mixed with salty solutions that have formed over hundreds of millions of years.

Frack back-flow has historically been hauled from well sites for processing at approved treatment plants.

But as state regulations have been tightened concerning where and how the water is to be treated. That has, in turn, increased the numbers of drillers who are recycling the water or treating it on-site for reuse, Yoxtheimer said.

The Marcellus formation is relatively dry and has the ability to absorb the 80 percent to 90 percent of the water, sand and chemical solution that remains in the well after the fracturing, Yoxtheimer said.

“Ideally there wouldn’t be any interaction or noticeable disturbance,” he said.

Dennis Beck, chairman of the Cambria County Conservation District’s Water Resources and Watershed Development Committee, sees the potential for big problems.

Beck, who also is a member of the Portage Water Authority, would like to see clearer identification on tanker trucks used when the frack water overflow is taken from a well site.

Generally, signage says the tankers are carrying “brine and residual waste.”

“There is a lot more stuff in there than salty water,” he said.

If a tanker comes around the north of Blue Knob and flips over on the Route 164 hairpin curve at the reservoir, significant problems could result, Beck said.

“The firemen will look at that placard and think it’s just brine and wash it off the highway into the reservoir,” Beck said.

Waste material OK’d for Hazleton mineland

http://www.timesleader.com/news/Waste_material_OK_rsquo_d_for_Hazleton_mineland_12-13-2010.html

Waste material OK’d for Hazleton mineland

A company spokesman sees job creation, but a critic fears a hazardous waste dump.

STEVE MOCARSKY smocarsky@timesleader.com

HAZLETON – The state on Monday approved the use of waste material from coal-fired electric generation plants as fill for some abandoned mineland in southern Luzerne County.

Edwardsville-based Hazleton Creek Properties began the controversial reclamation project five years ago at the 277-acre site bounded by state routes 93, 309 and 924.

Some have opposed using certain types of fill at the site, believing they could harm local water supplies.

Hazleton Creek Properties spokesman Frank Keel said the privately funded reclamation project is arguably the most vetted of its kind in the state. He is sure the application was thoroughly examined and reviewed by the state Department of Environmental Protection and looks forward to the project moving ahead.

“Not only will the HCP project provide much-needed jobs for Hazleton area residents, it will also safely reclaim one of the most dangerous abandoned mines in Pennsylvania and turn it into developable land that will spur the local economy and create still more local jobs,” Keel said.

Todd Wallace, acting director of DEP’s Bureau of Waste Management, said the work will improve public safety and the environment by eliminating about 1.2 miles of dangerous highwalls and reducing acid mine drainage.

Under the terms of the permit, Hazleton Creek Properties will use up to 550,000 cubic yards annually of a mixture of dry flue gas desulfurization waste and coal ash to reclaim 53 acres of the site.

Dry flue gas waste is produced when a lime powder spray mixes with sulfur dioxide emissions in the air pollution control systems of coal-fired power plants.

“This permit will allow Hazleton Creek Properties to begin reclaiming a portion of the site and return it to productive use,” Wallace said.

The project does have detractors.

Bill Lockwood, president of local environmental group Save Us From Future Environmental Risk (SUFFER), said he was not surprised by DEP’s approval, given the agency’s past approval of other site permits despite opposition from environmentalists and some elected officials such as state Rep. Todd Eachus, D-Butler Township.

“It looks like instead of being the future site of an amphitheater, it’s going to be nothing but a hazardous waste dump,” Lockwood said.

A spokesman for Eachus, who has vehemently and vociferously opposed the use of dredged and other materials as fill from the project’s inception, did not return a call seeking comment.

This is the fourth permit regulating fill that DEP has issued. Since 2006, Hazleton Creek Properties has been using regulated fill material such as concrete, bricks, blocks and dredged material to build rail sidings and access roads, and to cap two old landfills at the site.

Two other permits issued this year authorize Hazleton Creek Properties to accept dredged materials, coal ash, and cement and lime furnace dust, as well as crushed construction and demolition material for use as fill.

Hazleton Creek Properties applied for the flue gas desulfurization permit in June. DEP held an informational meeting Aug. 31 and accepted public comment through the end of September.

Putting the Brakes on Natural Gas Fracking

Putting the Brakes on Natural Gas Fracking


December 13, 2010

Putting the Brakes on Natural Gas Fracking

Fracking, the process of blasting deep rock strata to release methane that can then be pumped to the surface and sold as natural gas, is one of the ugliest innovations the energy industry has come up with. And unlike the ugliness of the Alberta Tar Sands, fracking takes place in pristine rural farmlands of the Appalachian Mountain region, such as Pennsylvania and West Virginia.

Putting_the_Brakes_on_Natural_Gas_Fracking

Big frack attack: Is hydraulic fracturing safe?

http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/big-frack-attack-is-hydraulic-fracturing-safe

This is an excellent article covering all aspects or hydraulic fracturing.

In the 1953 Looney Tunes cartoon “Much Ado About Nutting,” a frustrated  squirrel hauls a coconut around New York City, aware it’s a feast but unable to crack it open. It’s reminiscent of an even trickier and more tantalizing jackpot that had, until recently, eluded the United States for nearly two centuries: shale gas, the hard-shelled dark horse of fossil fuels.

That squirrel never tasted the fruits of his labor, however, while the U.S. started figuring out shale gas by the late 1990s and early 2000s, after nibbling at it since the 1820s. But as shale fever sweeps the country — courtesy of a gas-drilling trick called hydraulic fracturing, aka “fracking” — some Americans have begun to wonder if, like the squirrel, we might be hurting ourselves as much as the protective husk around our prize.

DRAFT NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

From the Delaware River Basin Commission’s Web Site
http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/

DRAFT NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
posted December 9, 2010

Written comments accepted through 5 p.m. March 16, 2011. Three public hearings will be scheduled; details will be released as soon as they are confirmed.

Please note that this public rulemaking process must be completed prior to the Commissioners taking any action on the proposed regulations. Such action will be taken at a duly noticed public meeting of the Commission at a future date.

http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/notice_naturalgas-draftregs.htm