Water agency to publish gas drilling regulations

http://online.wsj.com/article/AP01539f691bec4cc08103242571a7f2e2.html
DECEMBER 9, 2010

Water agency to publish gas drilling regulations

WEST TRENTON, N.J. — The agency that oversees water quality and quantity in the Delaware River basin says it has finished work on proposed regulations for the natural gas drilling industry.

The Delaware River Basin Commission announced Wednesday that draft regulations will be available for public review beginning at 9 a.m. Thursday.

The commission has declared a moratorium on Marcellus Shale drilling projects in the Delaware River basin until the rulemaking process is complete. The panel has jurisdiction because the drilling process will require the withdrawal of huge amounts of water from the watershed’s streams and rivers. The commission has also cited the potential for groundwater and surface water contamination.

Drilling is in full swing elsewhere in Pennsylvania.

The DRBC is a compact agency representing the federal government and the states of Delaware, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Monitoring River Water

http://www.wbng.com/news/local/Monitoring-River-Water-111551409.html

Monitoring River Water

By WBNG News
December 8, 2010

Apalachin, NY (WBNG Binghamton) When some Pennsylvania residents began to claim that horizontal gas drilling contaminated drinking water, many were asked to provide a pre-drilling water test to show the difference. River water will now undergo a similar test.

Ten of these monitoring sensors will be installed along tributaries to the Susquehanna River in the Southern Tier. They will measure basic information about water quality.

That includes “temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, pH,” said Kimberly Dille with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. “We’re measuring at a five-minute interval.”

If and when horizontal gas drilling moves forward in New York, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission wants to know the condition of the water ahead of time, in case an accident contaminates the water.

“If any deviations would occur that would depart from normal ranges, an alert is sent to our office where staff would immediately know if there was a change of condition,” said the SRBC’s Andrew Gavin.

“There are certain conditions in local streams that might even be natural for an area,” said Susan Obleski of the SRBC. “If people see spikes in certain chemicals they may not realize that that tends to happen naturally certain times of the year.”

The SRBC has been working with the Tioga County Planning Department on finding locations for sensors on the Apalachin and Catatonk Creeks.

“We’ve always know that monitoring water quality — both getting a baseline before drilling, during drilling and after drilling was very important to our drinking water,” said Elaine Jardine, Tioga Co. Planning Director.

The SRBC will install ten monitors in New York. It already has thirty in Pennsylvania.

After a monitoring station is installed, anyone can check water conditions at SRBC.net.

States Pursue Radon Limits in Drinking Water as EPA Action Lags

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/12/07/07greenwire-states-pursue-radon-limits-in-drinking-water-a-78542.html

States Pursue Radon Limits in Drinking Water as EPA Action Lags

By GAYATHRI VAIDYANATHAN of Greenwire

Published: December 7, 2010

States are taking the lead with studying levels of radon in drinking water and air even as federal regulators lag, as a coincidence of geology and population density leaves some more at risk than others of suffering from the naturally occurring radioactive toxin.

Nine states have guidelines for radon in drinking water, with New Jersey considering the most stringent levels, fourfold tighter than a limit proposed but never mandated by U.S. EPA in 1999.

Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, Massachusetts and Wisconsin are the other states that have some guidance levels for the chemical, said Ted Campbell, a hydrogeologist with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and chairman of a committee tasked with recommending its own levels.

But most of the recommendations are at levels scientists say are insufficient to protect human health. Read more

Study Charts How Underground CO2 Can Leach Metals into Water

http://solveclimatenews.com/news/20101207/study-charts-how-underground-co2-can-leach-metals-water

Study Charts How Underground CO2 Can Leach Metals into Water

Study is the first to observe, for at least a year, the effects of a CO2 leak on groundwater

by Catherine M. Cooney
Dec 7, 2010

It’s not a common for a solution to carbon emissions to also pose a contamination danger for drinking water supplies, but new research indicates that if CO2 stored deep underground were to leak in even small amounts, it could cause metals to be released in shallow groundwater aquifers at concentrations that would pose a health risk.

In a study published in Environmental Science & Technology, authors Mark Little and Robert B. Jackson studied samples of sand and rock taken from four freshwater aquifers located around the country that overlie potential carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) sites.

The scientists found that tiny amounts of CO2 drove up levels of metals including manganese, cobalt, nickel, and iron in the water tenfold or more in some places. Some of these metals moved into the water quickly, within one week or two. They also observed potentially dangerous uranium and barium steadily moving into the water over the entire year-long experiment.

“We did the study to try and build a framework to help predict where problems with groundwater might arise if CO2 leaked,” Jackson told SolveClimate News. “The chemistry of the water provides us with an early warning of the potential leaks before the leaks occur, and that by itself if a very useful tool,” Jackson added.

The technology for capturing and storing CO2 emissions from coal plants and industrial facilities is not yet commercially available. Still, the Obama Administration and other governments consider capturing carbon dioxide and sequestering it underground a vital technology that will allow the world to continue using coal as fuel while reducing the impacts of climate change. This new study sheds further light on how fresh water contamination from the technology could potentially occur.

Similar to Ocean Acidification

When the CO2 buried deep underground escapes into groundwater, it forms carbonic acid, a chemical reaction very similar to the process that occurs when the oceans absorb CO2. But the problems created by the carbonic acid in groundwater are quite different from the reactions that occur in the ocean, Little said.

Scientists have already observed that atmospheric CO2 is causing ocean acidification that is harming corals, shellfish, lobsters, and other marine animals at the bottom of the sea. The increased acidity caused by CO2 dissolved in water underground can cause metals to leach out of surrounding sand and rock.

Borrowed from agencies such as the US Geological Survey, the sediment used in the study was from 17 locations within four project sites: Acquia and Virginia Beach in the Virginia and Maryland tidewater region; Mahoment in Illinois; and Ogallala in the southern high plains of Texas. The scientists dried the sediment samples and placed them in bottles, then piped a stream of 99.8% pure CO2 to each bottle for 320 to 344 days.

Jackson and Little used their observations of the leaking CO2 to develop selection criteria, based on the metal contamination seen in the water, to help owners and operators choose CCS sites that are less likely to contaminate nearby freshwater aquifers. They also identified four geochemical markers to help monitor sites and discover when CO2 has leaked and caused metals to move into the groundwater.

Jackson, Nicholas Professor of Global Environmental Change at Duke University’s Center on Global Change (co-author Little was a postdoc fellow at the time of the study), said the research is unique because of its length: it is the first to observe, for at least a year, the effects of a CO2 leak on groundwater.

Scientists have already conducted short-term experiments of two-weeks to one month and found that CO2 in very small amounts can escape along rock faults and old petroleum wells into near-by groundwater and release harmful metals such as arsenic and uranium into the water.

Once CO2 reaches a freshwater aquifer, the quality of the drinking water is site specific, and depends on an array of factors including the size of the leak and the types of bacteria in the water, Little said. “By no means would all sites be susceptible to problems of water quality,” Jackson added.

Other researchers are trying to determine how a very large leak might affect the subsurface environment, while the Department of Energy (DOE) and private investors are beginning studies of potential groundwater contamination in the field, rather than in a lab as Jackson and Little did.

EPA’s Rule

The paper was published just as EPA finished a rule designed to protect potential drinking water sources from contamination following a CO2 leak. Announced on November 22, the rule is written for the owners and operators of potential CCS wells. It’s designed to ensure that the wells are appropriately sited, constructed, tested, monitored, and closed, according to EPA.

Sally Benson, director of the Global Climate and Energy Project at Stanford University, said EPA’s rule should protect groundwater because it will make it difficult to inject CO2 too close to a possible drinking water source. She also said the new study doesn’t present any surprises and is not likely to put an obstacle in the way of those CCS projects in the planning stages.

“Really, it gets down to making sure projects are designed carefully and that the project has monitoring so that one has early warning of any CO2 movements,” Benson added.

But drinking water utilities aren’t convinced that EPA’s rule will protect water sources from metal contamination resulting from the bubbling up of CO2, which is sure to occur in small amounts at least.

Cynthia Lane with the American Water Works Association (AWWA), a nonprofit research and advocacy organization representing researchers and water utilities, said this rule doesn’t include specific site selection criteria. Rather, the rule leaves many of the decisions about site selection and permit approval up to each state.

“It is not as protective as we might like,” said Lane. “We are concerned about the quality of drinking water. There is a definite shift in certain parts of country to use saline or more brackish water for drinking.”

Groundwater protections should be in place for areas in the southwest, such as Las Vegas, where utilities are having a difficult time finding water sources, Lane said. “They are using anything that is wet no matter what the saline content is,” Lane added.

After observing the CO2 percolating through aquifer sand and sediment for a year, Jackson said the study strongly suggests to him that long-term monitoring for CO2 leakage into freshwater aquifers should be part of every CCS project.

The CO2 caused concentrations of manganese, cobalt, nickel, and iron to increase by more than 100 times the original levels (or 2 orders of magnitude), and potentially dangerous uranium and barium increased throughout the entire experiment in some samples. In general, they found that iron and manganese concentrations increased within 100 days. The response of other potentially harmful metals was more varied.

“We don’t want a private homeowner with a well that is not regularly monitored by the local utility to suddenly have elements in their groundwater that they don’t even know about.”

The two researchers are now collecting data on sites that are under consideration by DOE and private consortiums.

“Our next step is to do incubations under a variety of conditions,” said Jackson. “I think we could contribute to a list that indicates why certain sites are better than other sites.”

Publication addresses water withdrawals for Marcellus gas drilling

http://live.psu.edu/story/50172#nw69
Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Publication addresses water withdrawals for Marcellus gas drilling

University Park, Pa. — Penn State Cooperative Extension < http://extension.psu.edu/ > has released an updated version of a publication that addresses the rapidly changing topic of water withdrawals for Marcellus Shale gas drilling.

Originally published in September 2009, “Water Withdrawals for Development of Marcellus Shale Gas in Pennsylvania” reflects the latest Marcellus-related regulatory changes enacted by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, the Delaware River Basin Commission and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Water is a critical component in the process of extracting natural gas from the Marcellus Shale formation. Public policies for managing and protecting water resources are common concerns of Pennsylvania residents, according to a water-policy expert in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences. < http://agsci.psu.edu/ >

“Development of the Marcellus Shale could have major economic and environmental effects for Pennsylvanians and residents of neighboring states,” said Charles Abdalla, professor of agricultural and environmental economics. “Individuals, businesses and communities will be affected well into the future as this energy resource is fully developed.

“Citizens need to become aware of their stake in water-resource issues and policies and effectively participate in public policy-making,” he said. “Public policies for water management and protection will be improved if the affected parties — which include almost everyone — are well-informed about likely impacts and take advantage of opportunities to participate in decisions.”

Seeking to engage residents, landowners, federal and state agency personnel, environmental organizations, economic development groups and others, the publication discusses the fast-evolving issues and public policies related to water resources and Marcellus Shale gas exploration.

While adequate supplies of water are one of several essential inputs needed to extract gas from the shale, wastewater is an output from the process that must be treated or disposed of properly.

“Through this publication, we hope to increase the public’s understanding of water use and management related to Marcellus Shale gas development and help people understand how and where they can offer input into public decisions about water use and wastewater treatment,” said Abdalla, the publication’s lead author.

“Now is the time for people to learn about and help shape public policies that will guide development of the Marcellus Shale,” he said. “These policies will play a large part in determining the economic well-being and quality of life for residents of the commonwealth for a long time — perhaps generations — to come.”

Funding for the updated publication comes from the Pennsylvania Water Resources Research Center
< http://www.pawatercenter.psu.edu/ > at Penn State. To obtain a free copy, contact the Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences Publication Distribution Center < http://pubs.cas.psu.edu/ >, The Pennsylvania State University, 112 Agricultural Administration Building, University Park, PA 16802-2602; telephone: 814-865-6713; fax: 814-863-5560; or send an e-mail to AgPubsDist@psu.edu.

This publication also is available online in PDF format. < http://extension.psu.edu/water/resources/publications/consumption-and-usage/marcelluswater.pdf/view >

The publication is the latest in a series initiated by Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences and Penn State Cooperative Extension to address issues related to Marcellus Shale gas exploration and development. Other publications in the series, along with related webinars, presentations and events, can be viewed at Cooperative Extension’s “Natural Gas” website. < http://extension.psu.edu/naturalgas >

‘Fracking’ Has a Friend in Pennsylvania

The Carbon County Groundwater Guardians do not support any political party or individual politicians.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/12/06/pa-gov-elect-to-open-state-land-to-fracking.html

‘Fracking’ Has a Friend in Pennsylvania

Beneath the eastern U.S. is enough natural gas to power the coast, perhaps for 50 years. But the cache is cordoned off because of concerns about “fracking,” the method of harvesting gas by blasting the shale with a mix of water, sand, and chemicals. The EPA is investigating if the method affects reservoirs, while landowners, spurred by flammable tap water and allegations of poisoned animals, have launched lawsuits. But fracking may be poised for a comeback—at least politically.

With the House in Republican hands, fracking is likely to survive efforts to regulate it under the Safe Drinking Water Act. But more significantly, this foe of environmentalists now has a friend in gas-rich Pennsylvania. Governor-elect Tom Corbett will soon reopen state land to new drilling, his spokesperson tells NEWSWEEK. That would clear the way for as many as 10,000 wells (up from the 25 active today) and, according to a recent study, create tens of thousands of new jobs and hundreds of millions in state- and local-tax revenue. The industry funded that research. But the prospect is tempting others: New York Governor-elect Andrew Cuomo is also open to lifting his state’s moratorium, says a spokesperson.

Live WVIA show eyes drilling’s impact

http://www.timesleader.com/news/Live_WVIA_show_eyes_drilling_rsquo_s_impact_12-05-2010.html
Posted: December 6
Updated: Today at 12:30 AM

Live WVIA show eyes drilling’s impact

WVIA will broadcast an episode of its “State of Pennsylvania” program debating the change natural gas drilling has brought to the northern tier of the state live at 7 p.m. Thursday from the Keystone Theater in Towanda.

A panel of Bradford County municipal officials, business owners and natural gas company representatives will answer audience questions and discuss changes in the economy and quality of life gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale has brought to the Towanda area.

Free tickets to attend the show may be reserved by calling the Keystone Theatre at 570-602-1150 or online at wvia.org.

Times Leader Staff

Horse out of the barn on gas drilling

http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101205/NEWS04/12050305
December 05, 2010

Horse out of the barn on gas drilling

The federal Interior Department is considering whether natural gas drillers should have to disclose the chemicals they use in hydraulic fracturing. This after-the-fact approach to environmental regulation says a lot about how Americans willingly accept unknown risks for the sake of immediate, relatively short-term energy gratification.

“Fracking” involves injecting millions of gallons of water containing chemicals and sand, deep underground. The pressure of the liquid creates cracks through which natural gas can flow and be extracted. The process is highly controversial because of the possibility of spills and of contaminating groundwater. Already instances of contaminated wells have cropped up in well-drilling areas of Pennsylvania, and many spills have occurred. This represents a major public health and safety concern. After all, the majority of Pocono-area residents rely on wells for their drinking water, and millions of Pennsylvanians and New Yorkers depend on clean drinking water from the Delaware River.

Material safety data sheets that the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection obtained from drilling companies list nearly 80 chemicals they use in the fracking process, among them ethylbenzene, methanol, aqueous ammonia and sulfuric acid. These pose a threat to everything from the tiny organisms that live under rocks in streams to birds, fish, animals and humans.

Industry officials argue that disclosing exactly what they use in the fracking process would reveal valuable proprietary information. But as long as regulators allow this drilling method, the public should know the formula for what is flowing into the ground under their property and their neighbors’ property. And certainly workers should know what they may be exposed to. An Oil and Gas Accountability Project study reported that Colorado had about 1,500 reported spills of various types, including fracturing fluids, in five years, while New Mexico had close to 800.

Still, shouldn’t regulators be focusing more on how drillers are extracting gas, rather than on what’s in the fracking fluid? Requiring super-strong well casings would reduce the likelihood of blowouts that could pollute the shallow aquifers we tap for our drinking water. Requiring all drillers to recycle the little fracking fluid they recover would help, too. Instead, regulators say they want to know what’s in the fluid, presumably so that after the fact they can treat the used water, treat humans who’ve been exposed to it, or enable well owners to test for specific contaminants. That’s all about response, not prevention.

In recent years Pennsylvania has become a mecca for gas drilling companies eager to exploit the gas-rich Marcellus shale deposit. The substances flowing underground, and sometimes escaping above ground and into our streams, could produce a dangerous legacy for our future. The real fact is that we are risking our common environment and natural landscape and putting our clean water in jeopardy for the sake of a few decades of natural gas.

D.C. water may still be contaminated

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-breaking-news/dc-water-may-still-be-contamin.html?wpisrc=nl_natlalert

D.C. water may still be contaminated

By Ashley Halsey III and Mike DeBonis
Posted at 8:50 PM ET, 12/ 1/2010

The water in almost 15,000 D.C. homes that were repaired during a massive effort to remove lead pipes may still be contaminated by dangerous levels of the metal, according to a report released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

If those residences are home to small children, pregnant women or anyone with a compromised immune system, the water should be tested, said George Hawkins, general manager of D.C. Water.

Read the report here. (PDF) < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/cdc_dc_water12012010.pdf >

The CDC concluded that homeowners who had pipes only partially replaced might have made the problem worse. The center also confirmed that children living in the District were exposed to lead poisoning from 2000 to 2006 as an inadvertent result of efforts to disinfect the water supply caused lead pipes to corrode and leach into the water that flowed through them.

The findings are a sharp reversal by the federal health agency, which initially claimed that they found no evidence that spikes in the level of lead in the water had harmed D.C. residents. A congressional inquiry concluded in May that the CDC knowingly used false data in making a “scientifically indefensible” claim that the water was safe to drink.

The report marks the first time the CDC has publicly acknowledged that there was measurable health risk from the city’s lead crisis and that the primary remedy appears to have been flawed.

Coal Tar Sealant Largest Source of PAHs in Lakes

http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2651

Coal Tar Sealant Largest Source of PAHs in Lakes

Coal-tar-based pavement sealant is the largest source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in 40 urban lakes studied by the U.S. Geological Survey.
PAHs are an environmental health concern because several are probable human carcinogens, they are toxic to fish and other aquatic life, and their concentrations have been increasing in urban lakes in recent  decades.

Coal-tar-based pavement sealant is the black, shiny substance sprayed or painted on many parking lots, driveways, and playgrounds. USGS scientists evaluated the contribution of PAHs from many different sources to lakes in cities from Anchorage, Alaska, to Orlando, Fla. The full report can be found in the journal Science of the Total Environment. < http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00489697 >

USGS scientists collected sediment cores from 40 lakes, analyzed the cores for PAHs, and determined the contribution of PAHs from many different sources using a chemical mass-balance model. On average, coal-tar-based sealcoat accounted for one-half of all PAHs in the lakes, while vehicle-related sources accounted for about one-quarter.  Lakes with a large contribution of PAHs from sealcoat tended to have high PAH concentrations, in many cases at levels that can be harmful to aquatic life. Analysis of historical trends in PAH sources to a subset of the lakes indicates that sealcoat use since the 1960s is the primary cause of increases in PAH concentrations.

“These findings represent a significant advance in our understanding of the sources of these contaminants in streams and lakes,” said USGS scientist Peter Van Metre. “Identifying where contaminants are coming from is the first step in designing effective management strategies.”

Coal tar is made up of at least 50 percent PAHs. Pavement sealants that contain coal tar, therefore, have extremely high levels of PAHs compared to other PAH sources such as vehicle emissions, used motor oil,  and tire particles. Small particles of sealcoat are worn off of the surface relatively rapidly, especially in areas of high traffic, and are transported from parking lots and driveways to streams and lakes by storm runoff.  Manufacturers recommend resealing surfaces every three to five years. Runoff isn’t the only path by which PAHs are leaving parking lots.  A recent USGS study found that use of coal-tar-based sealcoat on parking lots was associated with elevated concentrations of PAHs in house dust.

Sealcoat products are widely used in the U.S., both commercially and by homeowners. The products are commonly applied to commercial parking lots (including strip malls, schools, churches and shopping centers), residential driveways, apartment complexes and playgrounds. The City of Austin, Texas estimates that before a ban on use of coal-tar-based sealcoat in 2006, about 600,000 gallons of sealcoat were applied every year in the city.

Two kinds of sealcoat products are widely used: coal-tar-emulsion based and asphalt-emulsion based.  Consumers can determine whether a product contains coal tar by reading the label or asking the company hired to do the pavement application. The coal-tar products have PAH levels about 1,000 times higher than the asphalt products. National use numbers are not available; however, previous research suggests that asphalt-based sealcoat is more commonly used on the West Coast and coal-tar based sealcoat is more commonly used in the Midwest, the South, and the East. The results of the lake study reflect this east-west difference. For example, sealcoat contributes over 80 percent of PAHs in Lake Anne, Va., and PAH concentrations there are about twenty times higher than in Decker Lake, Utah, even though the areas have similar population density and level of urban development. Furthermore, PAH levels in pavement dust from sealcoated parking lots in Va. are about 1,000 times higher than those from sealed parking lots in Utah.

To learn more, visit the USGS National Water Quality Assessment Program < http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ >website on PAHs and sealcoat. < http://tx.usgs.gov/coring/allthingssealcoat.html >

Contact Information:
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Office of Communication
119 National Center
Reston, VA 20192

Jennifer LaVista
Phone: (303) 202-4764

Peter Van Metre
Phone: (512) 927-3506