Study: Drillers spending millions to influence state government – News – Citizens Voice

Study: Drillers spending millions to influence state government – News – Citizens Voice.

Agency for toxic substances issues results of screenings

Reported on Wednesday, May 12, 2010
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry has released its final report regarding the Community Health Screening for the JAK2 genetic marker.

The community health screening was done in response to recent studies that found an increased number of cases of PV in Schuylkill, Luzerne, and Carbon counties.

It was the first time large-scale screening for this JAK2 genetic mutation has been done in the United States. The frequency of the mutation in the general population is not known. The federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) conducted the screenings in partnership with the Pennsylvania Department of Health and Mt. Sinai School of Medicine.

Following two rounds of community health screening in northeastern Pennsylvania for the JAK2 genetic marker, 19 (1.6 percent) of the 1,170 persons tested were found to have this mutation. Five persons were previously diagnosed with polycythemia vera (PV) or a similar blood disease.

Since the JAK2 genetic marker was identified in 2004, studies have shown that this mutation is present in approximately 95 percent of patients with PV.

Patients with related conditions, essential thromboycytosis (ET) and primary myelofibrosis, also can carry the mutation. Scientists do not yet know whether the mutation occurs in otherwise healthy people.

Scientists also do not know how prevalent the mutation is in the general population, or whether everyone who has the mutation will develop PV or a related blood disease.

To help answer these questions, ATSDR is supporting work to determine how commonly the JAK2 mutation occurs in the general population inside and outside of the tri-county area.

For more information about the PV investigation, visit the PV website at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/sites/polycythemia_vera/.

ATSDR, a federal public health agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, evaluates the human health effects of exposure to hazardous substances.

Gas drilling information session set for Thursday

http://citizensvoice.com/news/gas-drilling-information-session-set-for-thursday-1.776328

Gas drilling information session set for Thursday
Published: May 10, 2010

An informational meeting on natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale will be offered Thursday in Lehman Township.

The meeting will be held from 6 to 8:30 p.m. at Lake-Lehman High School on Old Route 115.

Representatives from DEP, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission and natural gas experts from Penn State will give presentations.

Casey Calls for More Oversight of Natural Gas Drilling

http://casey.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=e0885ca7-425b-4f8e-b03f-31a75acfc610

Urges EPA investigation of drinking water contamination

April 26, 2010

SCRANTON, PA—U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) today was joined by residents in the Dimock area whose wells were contaminated by drilling conducted by Texas-based Cabot Oil and Gas Corp. as he called for additional oversight of natural gas drilling.  Senator Casey today sent a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urging them to examine its current authority to determine whether it can take additional steps in Pennsylvania to investigate and respond to groundwater contamination and other potentially harmful consequences of drilling.

“Natural gas drilling can provide an economic boost to Pennsylvania but we must protect ground water,” said Senator Casey.  “We will not allow an out-of-state company to come to Pennsylvania and contaminate the groundwater of our residents.  Three million Pennsylvanians rely on wells for their drinking water.  We must ensure adequate safeguards are in place to protect this most basic necessity for Pennsylvanians.”
Read more

Public forum on gas drilling to air live on PCN

http://citizensvoice.com/news/public-forum-on-gas-drilling-to-air-live-on-pcn-1.739337

Public forum on gas drilling to air live on PCN
Published: April 22, 2010

PCN will broadcast live coverage of a town meeting on the subject of natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale from 7 to 9 tonight, then air it again at 9 a.m. Friday. The forum is being held at the Community Theatre, 100 W. Third St., Williamsport.

The panel includes John Hanger, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection; Paul Kieffer, manager of financial planning at M&T Bank, the show’s sponsor; Kathryn Klaber, executive director of the Marcellus Shale Coalition; Vincent Matteo, president and CEO of the Williamsport/Lycoming Chamber of Commerce; Dale A. Tice of the Marshall, Parker and Associates law firm; and state Sen. Gene Yaw, R-Loyalsock Township, a member of the Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee.

For information, visit www.pcntv.com.

Water Well Pennsylvania testing offered to residents near drilling site

http://citizensvoice.com/news/well-testing-offered-to-residents-near-drilling-site-1.738187

Well testing offered to residents near drilling site
By Elizabeth Skrapits (Staff Writer)
Published: April 21, 2010

brian at the Lehman Township Fire Hall

elizabeth skrapits / the citizens’ voice Brian Oram, a hydrogeologist from Wilkes University, talks about local geology Tuesday at the Lehman Township Fire Hall.

LEHMAN TWP. – Residents near a planned natural gas well site in Lake Township were advised Tuesday to take advantage of an opportunity to have their private wells tested.

Encana Oil & Gas USA Inc., in partnership with WhitMar Exploration Co., has selected the Salansky property on Sholtis Road in Lake Township as the site of the second of three proposed exploratory natural gas wells in Luzerne County.

State regulations require natural gas drilling companies to sample drinking water wells within 1,000 feet of their drilling sites, but Encana is testing within a 1-mile radius of its proposed drilling sites.

The companies plan to start drilling at the Lake Township site in July if they can receive the required permissions, Encana Spokeswoman Wendy Wiedenbeck said. The first site to be drilled will be the Buda property behind the Ricketts Glen Hotel in Fairmount Township, in June. Although the companies have required permits to drill at a third site, the Lansberry property in Lehman Township, Wiedenbeck said she is not sure when drilling will start there.

Encana has retained Lancaster-based RETTEW Associates Inc. as a third-party firm to do the sampling, and King-of-Prussia-based TestAmerica as its independent laboratory to do the tests.

Drilling will not start until the water testing is complete, Wiedenbeck said. The reason for the water testing is to establish a baseline, or show what is in peoples’ well water before the drilling starts.

A few residents expressed concern about a similar situation like that in Dimock Township, where 14 families’ wells were invaded by methane. The state Department of Environmental Protection fined Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., made the company cap three wells, and put a stop to more drilling within a 9-square-mile radius of the township for at least a year. The problem is believed to have been caused by a faulty well casing.

Encana will follow protocols so as not to repeat the mistakes of the other well operator, according to Wiedenbeck. Differences include two well casings, the first of which will go at least 50 feet below the nearest known water source.

“I don’t know if there’s anything I can say to erase the concern from another’s mistake,” Wiedenbeck said. “We will take steps so we do not impact the water.”

On questioning, Wiedenbeck admitted Encana may have had an impact to a water source – a stream – while drilling in Colorado, but said state environmental authorities were called immediately and the company implemented a new protocol afterwards.

Although people seem to have a lot of concerns about the hydraulic fracturing process, Wiedenbeck said the biggest concern should be about the well bore instead of 7,000 feet underground: the well bore integrity will prevent fluids and gas from migrating.

If Encana did impact residents’ water, the company would be responsible to make sure they had drinkable, usable water the same as before the incident, she said.

“I think they (Encana) danced around some of the questions, but the water testing is a good idea, at least to give us a baseline,” Jeffrey Chulick, who lives near the Lake Township site, said after the meeting when asked what he thought. “I’m not sure about the natural gas drilling, though.”

After the question-and-answer session with Encana, Wilkes University hydrogeologist Brian Oram gave a presentation on what’s underground and in the water in the region.

Oram, who is not involved with the water sampling or acting as a consultant to Encana – “My role isn’t to swing somebody either way,” as he put it – did advise people to have the water sampling done.

He said in his 20 years of doing baseline water testing in Luzerne County, he found 30 percent to 50 percent of private wells were contaminated. For example, methane was discovered in wells in Tunkhannock and Columbia County even before Marcellus Shale drilling started there, Oram said.

eskrapits@citizensvoice.com, 570-821-2072

Baseline Testing Natural Gas Development 

Webinar contrasts regional differences for shale-gas drilling

http://live.psu.edu/story/46121/nw69

Friday, April 16, 2010

Webinar contrasts regional differences for shale-gas drilling

University Park, Pa. — The grass sometimes looks greener on the other side of the fence — or in the other corner of the state — not necessarily because it actually is greener, but because a disturbance in one’s own backyard makes the local situation lose its luster.

That’s the case with some property owners in southwestern Pennsylvania as they compare their situations to landowners in the northeastern counties as the shale-gas boom continues to reverberate around the commonwealth, according to Gary Sheppard, Penn State Cooperative Extension educator from Westmoreland County. Read more

Well-regulated gas extraction won’t harm water supplies. But it will create Pa. jobs.

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100409_Shale_concerns_overblown.html

Posted on Fri, Apr. 9, 2010

Shale concerns overblown
Well-regulated gas extraction won’t harm water supplies. But it will create Pa. jobs.

Commentary By Lou D’Amico
(Lou D’Amico is president of the Pennsylvania Independent Oil and Gas Association (PIOGA) and an adviser to EnergyInDepth.org. For more information, see www.pioga.org.)

The Marcellus Shale, which according to some geologists is the world’s second-largest natural-gas field, holds the potential to create hundreds of thousands of new jobs for Pennsylvanians – while reducing our dangerous dependence on foreign energy resources.

We’ve known about the Marcellus Shale for years. But advances – specifically, horizontal drilling techniques coupled with a 60-year-old technology called hydraulic fracturing, in which fluid is forced underground – have finally enabled us to reach its enormous stores of clean-burning fuel.

While Marcellus Shale production in Pennsylvania is still in its infancy, the results so far have been very good. According to Penn State, shale gas exploration in this state has already created 48,000 jobs, along with billions of dollars in economic output and millions of dollars in state and local government revenue. Over the next 10 years, shale gas production is expected to create more than 200,000 jobs directly and indirectly, as well as $13 billion in economic activity.

And every cubic foot of natural gas produced here in the Keystone State represents one less cubic foot that America is forced to import from gas giants such as Russia and Iran. That’s good news, right?

Unfortunately, not everyone sees it that way. Last month, Philadelphia’s City Council unanimously adopted a resolution calling for a de facto moratorium on shale-gas development on privately owned land throughout the eastern sixth of the state.

The resolution says that the fluids used in the fracturing process, which are more than 99.5 percent water and sand, “are currently not required by law” to be disclosed, and that fracturing has caused “private well contamination.” One councilwoman said that gas development “should not occur without an environmental impact statement.”

Here are the facts: Hydraulic fracturing, which has been safely employed more than 1.1 million times in America, and is used today in 9 out of 10 wells nationwide, has never been found to contaminate groundwater – not once in 60 years. The Environmental Protection Agency’s top water official confirmed this just weeks ago. And the state Department of Environmental Protection has found that hydraulic fracturing “has not impacted local wells” and “is not a threat to water supplies.”

As for disclosure, federal law mandates that the fluids used in the fracturing process be identified and available at every well site. The DEP even lists the fracturing fluid’s composition on its Web site.

The states have always been the most effective energy regulators. And to help ensure Pennsylvania’s environment is protected, Gov. Rendell recently assigned an additional 68 state regulators to monitor Marcellus Shale production.

Unfortunately, by trying to bring the process under EPA oversight, Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) is among those working to strip Pennsylvania and other energy-producing states of their ability to effectively regulate fracturing, which has never been regulated by the federal government.

Council’s recent endorsement of such misguided efforts is unfortunate. Higher taxes and layers of unnecessary, duplicative regulations will not produce jobs or environmental benefits for the commonwealth.

Incidents where hydraulic fracturing is a suspected cause of drinking water contamination

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/amall/incidents_where_hydraulic_frac.html

Incidents where hydraulic fracturing is a suspected cause of drinking water contamination

Amy Mall

Senior Policy Analyst, Boulder, Colorado

NRDC supports federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing under the Safe Drinking Water Act. We believe this is a sensible approach that would ensure a minimum federal floor of drinking water protection in the more than 30 states where oil and gas production occurs.

Opponents of such regulation claim that hydraulic fracturing has never caused any drinking water contamination. They say this because incidents of drinking water contamination where hydraulic fracturing is considered as a suspected cause have not been sufficiently investigated, either because scientists and regulators could not properly investigate (did not have the information or technology needed) or because they chose not to, even where signs clearly point to hydraulic fracturing. Some cases where groundwater was contaminated during hydraulic fracturing operations have been attributed to other causes, such as faulty well structure, even if a well failed during the hydraulic fracturing process.

Below is a list of incidents where drinking water has been contaminated and hydraulic fracturing is a suspected cause. I can’t emphasize enough that there are many more cases of drinking water contamination around the country related to oil and gas production; those listed below are cases where a homeowner had enough detailed knowledge to know that a nearby well was recently fractured and specifically included that information in reports. In many cases of drinking water contamination where hydraulic fracturing has not been mentioned as  the cause, it may be because the homeowner does not know if the nearby gas well was recently fractured. It does not mean that hydraulic fracturing is completely absolved. As you will see, these cases are not limited to just one company or one state. The stories from around the country are unfortunately familiar.

Please send me other incidents of which you are aware, and I will add them to this list.

Arkansas: In 2008, Charlene Parish of Bee Branch reported contamination of drinking water during hydraulic fracturing of a nearby natural gas well owned by Southwestern Energy Company. Her water smelled bad, turned yellow, and filled with silt.

Arkansas: In 2007, the Graetz family in Pangburn reported contamination of drinking water during hydraulic fracturing of a nearby natural gas well owned by Southwestern Energy Company. The water turned muddy and contained particles that were “very light and kind of slick” and resembled pieces of leather.

Colorado: In 2001, two families in Silt reported a water well blow-out and contamination of their drinking water during hydraulic fracturing of four nearby natural gas wells owned by Ballard Petroleum, now Encana Corporation. Their drinking water turned gray, had strong smells, bubbled, and lost pressure. One family reported health symptoms they believe are linked to the groundwater contamination.

Colorado: In 2007, the Bounds family in Huerfano County reported a pump house exploded and contamination of drinking water during hydraulic fracturing of nearby wells owned by Petroglyph Energy.

New Mexico: A 2004 investigation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found two residents who reported that the quality of their water was affected by hydraulic fracturing.

New York: In 2007, the Lytle family in Seneca County reported contamination of drinking water the morning after hydraulic fracturing of a nearby natural gas well owned by Chesapeake Energy Corporation. The water turned gray and was full of sediment.

New York: In 2009, the Eddy family in Allegany County reported contamination of drinking water during hydraulic fracturing of a nearby well owned by U.S. Energy Development Corporation. The water turned “foamy, chocolate-brown.”

Ohio: In 2007, there was an explosion of a water well and contamination of at least 22 other drinking water wells in Bainbridge Township after hydraulic fracturing of a nearby natural gas well owned by Ohio Valley Energy Systems. More than two years later, over forty families are still without clean drinking water and are waiting to be connected to a town water system.

Pennsylvania:  In 2009, the Zimmerman family of Washington County reported contamination of drinking water after hydraulic fracturing of nearby natural gas wells owned by Atlas Energy. Water testing on their farm found arsenic at 2,600 times acceptable levels, benzene at 44 times above limits, naphthalene at five times the federal standard, and mercury and selenium levels above official limits.

Pennsylvania: In 2008, two families in Gibbs Hill reported contamination of drinking water after hydraulic fracturing of a nearby natural gas well owned by Seneca Resources Corporation. Their water had strong fumes, caused burning in lungs and sinuses after showering, and caused burning in the mouth immediately upon drinking.

Pennsylvania: In 2009, families in Bradford Township reported contamination of drinking water after hydraulic fracturing of nearby natural gas wells owned by Schreiner Oil & Gas. The drinking water of at least seven families has been contaminated.

Pennyslvania: In 2009, the Smitsky family in Hickory reported contamination of their drinking water after hydraulic fracturing of nearby natural gas wells owned by Range Resources. Their water became cloudy and foul-smelling. Testing found acrylonitrile, a chemical that may be used in hydraulic fracturing. The EPA is now investigating this incident.

Texas: In 2007, three families who share an aquifer in Grandview reported contamination of drinking water after hydraulic fracturing of a nearby well owned by Williams. They experienced strong odors in their water, changes in water pressure, skin irritation, and dead livestock. Water testing found toluene and other contaminants.

Virginia: Citizens reported drinking water contamination after hydraulic fracturing. Water was murky and had oily films, black sediments, methane, and diesel odors. Individuals experienced rashes from showering. The Buchanan Citizens Action Group reported over 100 documented complaints of adverse effects of hydraulic fracturing and the Dickenson County Citizens Committee reported ground water quality deteriorated throughout the county as a result of the large number of hydraulic fracturing events.

Wyoming: Families in the small town of Pavillion have been reporting contamination of their drinking water for at least ten years. Hydraulic fracturing has been used in the many wells in the area owned by Encana Corporation. Drinking water has turned black, smelled bad, and tasted bad. Individuals report medical symptoms they believe are related to water contamination. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is investigating and has found contamination in 11 water wells, including toxic chemicals that may be from hydraulic fracturing fluids. Further tests are needed to determine the source of contamination.

Home Water Well Testing in the Gas Well Era

June 15, 2010
2:00 — 4:00 pm
Damascus School
Damascus, PA
or
7:00 — 9:00 pm
Park Street Complex
648 Park St
Honesdale, PA

AGENDA

  • How gas wells can impact groundwater wells.
  • Regulations to protect private wells.
  • Potential water pollutants.
  • Testing strategies – including test packages through Penn State and third party water testing.
  • How to collect water samples.
  • Interpretation of water test results.

Water File 2

Webinar to address economic impact of shale gas drilling on March 18

Sometimes research can provide clarity to a question, and sometimes it can cloud the waters even further. That may be the case with some economic-impact studies of shale-gas drilling in Pennsylvania. At 1 p.m. on March 18, Tim Kelsey, professor of agricultural economics in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences, will deliver a free Web-based seminar designed to provide an overview of some of the research used by decision-makers to assess factors of economic development in their communities.

Read the full story on Live: http://live.psu.edu/story/45180/nw69